The given pictures detail the changes occurring in a town of lakeside from 2000 and 2009.
Overall, there were big differences in terms of industrialization and modernization during a period of 10 years. Typically, more amenities were constructed to serve citizens' demands.
On the west side of the river, a nearby residential area was demolished to make place for a new shopping center. Similarly, a cinema with multi-screen was built, which took the previous position of the arts center. Furthermore, the structure of the old town located in the central region was reconstructed into offices and a university to meet the working and learning requirements of inhabitants. Behind the office now was a large car park instead of derelict warehouses as a decade ago.
On the opposite side of the river, another residential area was destroyed for the purpose of industrialization, with the presence of an enormous industrial complex. Therefore, the region spent on woodland also shrank on the top right-hand corner of the map. Additionally, the disappearance of the lake was replaced by a pond with a smaller size. Besides, the location of north-west residential housing and school stayed unchanged over 10-year period.
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 93
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 78
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 78
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28350515464 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26858186039 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4656207229 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0423958497552 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0164408006803 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291984688807 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0342797755505 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394083479004 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28350515464 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26858186039 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4656207229 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0423958497552 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0164408006803 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291984688807 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0342797755505 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394083479004 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.