Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the 21st century, which is an information world, documents belonging to science, business and other sorts of academic fields are being widely spread. But whether they should be free sharing has caused a controversy. From my perspective, passing knowledge without limitation is more good than harm.
First, sceptics might opine that valuable information that experts hosted can benefit them, so oversharing badly influences these people. Therefore, if professionals do not get what they deserve, they can highly stop their investigation. Some Vietnamese scientists are a testament to this viewpoint. With a low salary, in some cases does not meet living cost needs, doctors still need to dedicate their whole life to provide useful research. As a result, some of them rapidly quit their job. So, some policies about intellectual spreading are considerable.
On the other hand, some people still cite that there is the most critical value beyond material benefits existing that is the development of humanity. Passing knowledge means our latter generation can learn more and also avoid bad lessons, therefore, worldwide will develop with less obstacles. Take a glance at our history, many scientific professionals such as Thomas Edison and Marie Curie share their knowledge without a doubt. And many great people gain profit and attention posthumously but they still devote the best.
To sum up, I stand for the viewpoint that research and valuable information should be passed freely in order to promote worldwide properties. In addition, the government still needs to pay attention to some policies that should be banned. Only by that way, our globe will accelerate sustainably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | paniz_kiani | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | CheeLee | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-05 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | khanhuyennnnnnnnnnnnn | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | niloya | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun obstacles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... therefore, worldwide will develop with less obstacles. Take a glance at our histor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... our globe will accelerate sustainably.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41287878788 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81285899658 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689393939394 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9568477247 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211166107155 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616204154309 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443801104615 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123940515114 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324949334818 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.