Throughout the world's oceans, hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants, coral and sponges can attach: and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish. Recently, workers in the fishing industry have tried to increase the amount of suitable habitat for fish by constructing artificial reefs from old metal objects and industrial materials and placing them in coastal waters. Artificial reefs have several benefits.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss artificial reefs. In this regard, article states that constructing artificial reefs from old material objects can have advantages for fishing industry, and mentions three benefits of artificial reefs. However, the professor explains that artificial reefs cause more problems than benefits and he refutes each of three ideas.
First, the passage states that many fishers believe that by giving fish more places to gather and reproduce artificial reefs have increased the populations of some species of fish. In contrary, the professor claims that overall fish population will not increase or grow. The reefs attracted too much fish even from far location. When fishes gather at the single location, it helps fishers to capture more fishes so population of fish will not be maintained.
Second, the reading mentions that artificial reefs have benefits for economic competitiveness of small-scale fishers because they are able to create their own private artificial reefs in secret locations. However, the professor refutes this idea by saying that such kind of artificial reefs being built on secret locations it might cause some problems. When these reefs are secret, they might cause crashing boats and ships, because fishers use large net and in shallow water reefs make their work difficult. Also, when the reefs are known to others, it will not have any benefit for local fishers.
Finally, the passage claims that artificial reefs can be made from old cars and other objects that are difficult to dispose of and it is really beneficial for environment. The lecturer, conversely, opposes this idea. The professor mentions that even under such a circumstance, it may pose a threat. And he uses example and claims that the azborn reef, which was made from using car tires, when they crashing in the sea it have harmful for marine animals and it damages lots of them.
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 70
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 80
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...tires, when they crashing in the sea it have harmful for marine animals and it damag...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e animals and it damages lots of them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20064724919 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52703773454 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53074433657 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3659636552 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151965584264 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569235827896 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299158435723 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097473628164 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141764728589 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.