The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the number of guests coming to a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
As can be seen from the chart, during the given period, the total quantity of tourists experienced a significant increase with most visitors choosing to stay on the island while the figure for those staying on cruise ships witnessed a substantial rise.
At the beginning of the period, the number of visitors spending their holidays on the island registered at around 0.75 million and remained unchanged for another year. This figure rose to 1.5 million in 2013 before experiencing a plateau in the next 2 years. In 2016, the number of guests staying on island dropped insignificantly to around 1.25 million, prior to recovery to 2 million in 2017.
In 2010, about half of 0.5 million visitors came to the and resided on their ships. 2 years later, this number observed a slight variation before rocketing to 2 million at the end of the examined period. A relatively similar pattern was observed in the total number of tourists coming to this island which increased substantially from 1 million in 2013 to 3.5.
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 61
- some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- Studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career 73
- Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94708994709 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71372355122 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9849737905 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135357967024 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718531065381 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709525974975 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109856625475 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798743063809 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.