The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table demonstrates details about how much a household earned and the pie charts give information about how an average family in one UK city spent on food on clothes in 2010 and 2013.
Overall, citizens in this city had a disposition of spending more while earning less money. In addition, it is clear that meat and fish made up the largest proportions in 2010, but three years later, they were replaced by fruits and vegetables.
Regarding the table, in 2010, a family earned 29000 dollars on average while they allocated nearly half of it to food and clothes. In the next three years, the income decreased by 4000 dollars while the expenditure increased to 15000 dollars.
Concerning the pie charts, in 2010, meat and fish accounted for the largest proportion of the total spending of an average household, at 25%. In 2013, this figure decreased to 15%. Likewise, the percentage of money allocated to clothes observed a dramatic drop, from 22% to 12% from 2010 to 2013. 20% of the expenses of a household were used for fruits and vegetables in 2010 while three years later, this figure increased dramatically to 35%. A similar trend was witnessed in the proportion of money spent on dairy products, which rose from 15% in 2010 to 20% in 2013. The figure for the amount of spending on other food and drinks remained stable over the given period, at 18%.
- Studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career 73
- It is the job of governments and companies to deal with the huge environmental problems which we face Individuals on their own can do little or nothing What is your opinion about this statement 89
- TECHNOLOGY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNEMPLOYMENT TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 73
- Write about the following topic It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76793248945 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53753183491 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527426160338 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1331330746 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.727272727 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375174064498 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122633909406 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142451611427 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232883734898 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19026334643 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.