People hold opposites views about the nature of creativity. A school of thought believes that creativity belongs to the instinct part of people whereas some people argue that this type of characteristic can be trained and promoted through the learning process. This essay will shed light on both views before presenting the personal perspective.
There are key reasons why creativity is considered to be an inborn feature of people. This is mainly because of natural differences between normal and other people whose careers are related to arts. In fact, artists have a tendency to be more creative and flexible. As a result, such people can compose valuable poems, impressive plays, and outstanding portraits which reach the bottom of audiences' hearts. If creativity is not an instinct part, the answers behind work arts are unable to find.
Despite some arguments mentioned above, I strongly contend that creativity, as well as other characteristics, are likely to be taught and developed by education. Firstly, it is indisputable fact that creativity plays one of the most important roles in the success of people, but not the whole, endeavor and patience are remarkable factors that also contribute to success. Therefore, despite the low level of creativity, people completely can reach their potential by means of training to be more flexible and catch up on current trends of all times. For example, developing yourself lessons are opened with the purpose of teaching children about critical thinking and other related skills, which contributes to boosting the level of creativity of people.
In conclusion, I believe that creativity is not only a form of instinct but also a skill that can be practiced and developed through studying and training procedure.
- The diagram below shows changes to one university campus 96
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt 78
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 84
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2695035461 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84382129385 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.838819332 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.307692308 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314202522881 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100107965035 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534980865132 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182777889572 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160953449188 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.