oil production
The table illustrates the amount of oil Nigeria, Chad, Congo and Somalia produced per day over a four-year period commencing 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the amount of oil produced a day by Nigeria and Somalia. Conversely, the figure for Congo decreased; however, it remained as the best oil generator, before being surpassed by Nigeria in the last year of the period. Also, not until 2003 did Chad produce oil.
The amount of oil produced in Nigeria started at 205,000, after which it experienced a moderate rise to 210,000 in 2003, before ending a period at 213,000. Similar changes, but to a greater extent, were seen in the figure for Somalia, which grew dramatically from 5,000 to 50,000 at the end of the period.
275,000 barrels of oil were produced by Congo in 2000, with a subsequent fall of roughly 50,000 barrels after 2 years, and a final drop to 203,000 barrels in 2004. Meanwhile, Chad had its first oil production in 2003, standing at 8,000, followed by a sharp climb to 50,000 barrels a day over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Yashainu291 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-16 | Sang Sang Sang | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | Хоанг Тунг Лам | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Tung lam | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | húc tinh | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53715893509 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3110591946 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206117360032 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107397573837 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602965809 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129535153518 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583798993717 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.