In some parts of the world, the popularity of taking a personal DNA is increasing. Why do some people want to do this? Is this development positive or negative?
The development of technology has revolutionized many aspects of people’s lives, particularly medicine. Thanks to technology, taking a sample of one’s DNA for analysis purposes has become popular in some countries. While there are a number of reasons why this is the case, on the whole, I believe that this is a positive change.
To begin with the reasons for the popularity of DNA testing, the major one is perhaps its help in medical diagnoses. In the event that symptoms do not give any clues about the nature of an illness, thus making it difficult to diagnose a patient correctly, taking a personal DNA will be of great help for a more thorough investigation. Another area of DNA testing’s use is in people’s personal lives. In some instances, people have doubts about their or their children’s background. DNA testing, meanwhile, allows to compare genes and provide conclusions with almost perfect accuracy.
In my view, conducting DNA testing is a change for the better. First and foremost, if we can draw accurate conclusions about illnesses, their treatment is highly likely to be successful. Were it not for DNA tests, we would probably be unable to see breakthroughs in such areas of medicine as biotechnology and cure diseases like IVF or infertility. I am also optimistic about this test’s future prospects. Genetics is one of the fastest developing, yet complex, fields of medicine currently. So, more research with the use of DNA testing could one day allow us to find solutions or vaccines to incurable illnesses, such as cancer, or at least make us more knowledgeable.
In conclusion, DNA testing has recently gained in wide popularity in some parts of the world due mainly to medical as well as personal reasons. So far, this kind of testing helped us find remedies to some illnesses, and in the future, if this trend continues to help humanity, then I have no reason to argue that is an undesirable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-23 | ESSEYWRITER | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing homework households in one country between 1920 and 2019
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 74
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comparing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: comparing
...kground. DNA testing, meanwhile, allows to compare genes and provide conclusions with almo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, thus, well, while, at least, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in my view, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00615384615 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9952230212 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587692307692 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4037983359 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2903338148 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849139625117 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664579393774 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188258781402 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892723744003 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.