Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sports competition in recent years has gained a great deal of public concern. Therefore, whether a country should hold a global sporting event or not has been a controversy. While come school of thought argue that hosting an international sports event has detrimental effects on the host country, I am convinced that this tendency brings various benefits.
On the one hand, there are certain drawbacks that a nation suffers from holding a sports event. Firstly, numerous people travel to hosting country can lead to the deterioration of the environment. Specifically, some environmental-unconscious visitor may show their bad manner by throwing rubbish or split on the ground. As a result, these unacceptable behaviors are the culprits behind the contamination of the local environment and put native inhabitants' health at risk. Secondly, it requires a large amount of governments' funds to host a sport competition. To be specific, the country has to pay for a variety of exorbitant expense, from enhancing equipment quality to providing services for the participants. Consequently, this may result in a serious deficit in the government budget.
On the other hand, hosting a global sporting competition have numerous merits for the country. Firstly, the host nation can acquire more reputation by constantly appearing on the coverage of the media around the globe. As a result, global citizens may have more understanding about the culture of the host country and therefore gives rise to the tourism industry. Secondly, it is advantageous for native people when holding a sports event right in their country. Specifically, when the number of foreigner travel to a country increase, there may be a great demand of accommodation, consumption and services. Therefore, it can facilitate the employment opportunities and the profit generated from selling souvenirs or other necessary things.
In conclusion, although it is true that a sports event has some detrimental effects on the host country, I believe that its advantages should not be ignored.
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ks that a nation suffers from holding a sports event. Firstly, numerous people travel ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...of the local environment and put native inhabitants health at risk. Secondly, it requires a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ageous for native people when holding a sports event right in their country. Specifica...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... conclusion, although it is true that a sports event has some detrimental effects on t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40498442368 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27675807272 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7982608595 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.058823529 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294480341189 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879542657022 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680633050332 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187220667336 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578008980367 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.