Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Recently, people have had divergent views about whether hosting major international sports events is beneficial for nations in terms of all aspects or doing a great disservice to citizens' life. Personally, I gravitate towards the latter statement. In this essay, I am going to explicate both its advantages and detrimental effects.
On one hand, undertaking sports events host is advantageous regarding of flourishing economy, residents' health, hospitality among participated countries. First and foremost, the nation can take advantage of hosting to boost tourism and majors related to as well as advertise its culture to worldwide neighbors. An event such as Olympic Games, for example, provides a variety of shop windows for tourists to purchase souvenirs. Besides, hosting an event also fosters an immense sporty spirit in citizens which will encourage them to take up sports. Hence, people's health and lives are likely to thrive. In terms of hospitality and friendship, the countries can tighten their friendship via hospitable behaviors and other attitudes.
On the other hand, organizing a sports event can cause adverse effects. The most noticeable is that the government of the host country need to pour tons of money into upgrading sports facility such as stadium, equipment, transport hub, etc. This is action is not only exorbitant but also synonymous with the state budget deficit. Indeed, residents' welfare would be curbed for expense's organization compensation and eventually led to raise a hue and cry in public. Moreover, the huge influx of sightseers can render the host nation's environment polluted owing to litter which put a strain on the government in the long term
All in all, hosting an international sports event is beneficial for enforcing friendships and thriving economic status. However, the government allocate a proper budget for such sports event and offer appropriate solutions for its repercussions.
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...tudes. On the other hand, organizing a sports event can cause adverse effects. The mo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...orts facility such as stadium, equipment,...etc. This is action is not only exorbi...
^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...train on the government in the long term All in all, hosting an international spo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42123287671 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99892667044 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9845245315 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228874582166 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674524045384 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492055681934 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143755240004 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359422480803 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.