The maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak comparisons where relevant.

The maps gave an ilustration about information on how to access to a city hospital that has changed over the three years. Overall, there were three different changes with regarding the access to the city hospital. A bus station, roundabouts, and car park were built as a new facilities.
According to detail analysis, the three bus stops at Hospital road were removed and replaced by a bus station located to the southwest of the City Hospital. In addition, the car park was divided into two different areas. The public car park were moved to the east side from the City Hospital, meanwhile the medical staff still stayed on the old park.
In 2010, the road leading to the hospital has also changed. They built two roundabouts linked up to the hospital royal city road and also the bus station on the east side. Furthermore, the ring road the city hospital was not modification comparing to the three prior years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-01 mahya25 73 view
Essays by user mahya25 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'facility'?
Suggestion: facility
...bouts, and car park were built as a new facilities. According to detail analysis, the th...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55370696198 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6485453706 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174929973679 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846071309818 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633037535719 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129557549175 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491377586424 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'facility'?
Suggestion: facility
...bouts, and car park were built as a new facilities. According to detail analysis, the th...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55370696198 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6485453706 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174929973679 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846071309818 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633037535719 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129557549175 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491377586424 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.