There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Currently, it is debatable whether the society should make extraordinary efforts to save endangered animal and plant species. Although some people believe that this effort is useless since it threatens people’s money and jobs, I argue that saving lives of endangered species are necessary work that people should take.
If the extinction is due to natural process, there is no justification to put efforts to save those endangered animals and plants. To illustrate, Darwin’s well-known theory of natural selection states that there are some species that are more incline to adopt in environment than others, and this indicates that extinction is sometimes a natural process. If animals or plants are disappeared due to this trend, the human efforts to save those lives are not required.
However, if the extinction is as a consequence of human activities, people should take measure to save these wildness lives. To be more specific, due to endless desire for efficiency and convenience, people in this present day and age continuously develop technologies and infrastructure. As a result, a huge portion of natural resources is used and environmental problems are aggravated. Due to this process, homes of many endangered animals and plants are threatened and the process of extinction exacerbate at the exponential rate. In such cases, people should participate in protecting these endangered species, since it was their activities that jeopardize these animals and plants.
In addition, activities of saving lives of endangered animals and plants should be taken since people have effective measurement to do so without the cost in money and jobs. For instance, it is possible that government designates a place as a national park and provides animals and plants a place to survive. In America, Yellowstone national park is a pristine forest that is home for thousands of animals and plant species. At the same time, since many visitors are coming to this park to enjoy natural views and see wildness species, the government can secure jobs of people and obtain profits from visitors. Consequently, it not only becomes a place to save endangered lives but also a place to foster economy. Therefore, people should put their efforts to save lives of animals, since it does not come at the expense of people’s money and jobs.
In conclusion, people should participate in saving lives of endangered animals and plants if the extinction is yield by human activities. They should take into consider that animals and plants are also crucial part of the planet, and without them, their lives can also be threatened.
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 73
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine."Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians. In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were 13
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine."Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey aske 70
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 80
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
saving lives of endangered species are necessary work that people should take.
saving lives of endangered species is a necessary work that people should take.
it not only becomes a place to save endangered lives but also a place to foster economy.
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
if the extinction is yield by human activities.
if the extinction is yielded by human activities.
Sentence: They should take into consider that animals and plants are also crucial part of the planet, and without them, their lives can also be threatened.
Description: A preposition is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to into and consider
flaws:
No. of Words: 421 while No. of Different Words: 181
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 421 350
No. of Characters: 2143 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.53 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.09 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.78 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 166 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.968 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.576 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.112 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5