Write an essay (at least 250 words) for the topic below:
One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
You should spend 40 minutes on this task.
Many people argue that increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles will make a way out of environmental problems. Personally, I completely disagree with this view because there are many more solutions for this matter such as focusing the investment on public transports or encouraging people on riding bicycles.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why the rise in the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles is considered most likely to deal with environmental problems. One reason is that higher cost of fuels result in less using private cars or other vehicles which required fuels to function. For example, when running errands, instead of driving despite the close distance, people will then have to reconsider and choose to walk or public transports due to the high cost of fuels. Besides, the limited budget in transportation will face the high cost of fuels. Fuels play an important role in raw materials production so their increasing in price will lead to the decline in demand of those material productions owing to the shortage in budget as well as the reduction of transports appearing on the road.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that this solution will only temporarily sort our environmental issues in a year or two while there are some other methods which are more likely to be long-lasting. Firstly, the government should take more action in improving and expanding the public transport. This way will influence how people view the convenience and necessity of public transport and through time, this means of transport will be a part of everyone’s life, indispensable and inseparable. Another essential aspect that should be considered for solving environmental problems is spreading the use of bicycles. Rather than driving around the city causing pollution, people should be encouraged on making use of bicycles as the huge benefits they bring not only in keeping a green environment but also keeping us healthy.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles is not an effective way to protect the environment. In fact, investing in public transport and spreading the use of bicycles are among the main solution for environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | vuhieuquy | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | faisal vhora | 55 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Khiem Duy | 74 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 84
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 598, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...ls. Fuels play an important role in raw materials production so their increasing in price...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12732095491 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86372907459 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501326259947 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0622262114 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.071428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251230385487 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102828617139 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839621930302 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185129129445 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559538264451 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.