Many people think that is unnecessary to teach children handwriting skills in this technology ages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been suggested that in this fast-developing world we might prioritise typing over handwritten letters. While there is some truth in the assertation that we are increasingly depending on keyboard, it is not necessarily true that this is at the cost of our handwriting skills.
To begin with, touch-type is undeniably a very useful skill in order to derive substantial benefits from electric devices on a daily basis. What is more, this skill not only helps us to text via social networking sites such as Facebook or Instagram, but it also contributes to the career prospect of the young nowadays. As a result of technology development, mastering Microsoft Office software is a requirement when a graduate applies for a new job.
Having said that, writing by hand is obligatory at most school all around the world. This is because writing skills is linked to grammar as well as spelling and reading skills. Furthermore, students have to sit the exams that require handwriting such as national high school graduation examination. While computers or tablets are much more available in rural areas, it is likely to be unfair if handwriting skills is completely replaced by typing. In Vietnam, for example, students in remote areas are living in poor conditions that they can’t afford any electric devices. A further advantages of practicing writing by hand that is widely believed especially in Eastern countries is that it could increase their level of patience. As a result, this might have a contribution to personality development.
In conclusion, I can see no compelling reason why people should eliminate handwriting skills away from school. Granted, online-learning is becoming increasingly ubiquitous during the Covid-19 pandemic, but it shouldn’t mean that we completely rely on technological devices.
- Many people work from home using modern technology today Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employers Do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of four different species of fish between 1982 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 89
- It is unaccepted that people who work in certain professions e g finance media entertainment and sport are paid such high salaries while others who do more important jobs in society are underpaid To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 95
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s some truth in the assertation that we are increasingly depending on keyboard, it is not necessarily true...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the cost of our handwriting skills. To begin with, touch-type is undeniably ...
^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontribution to personality development. In conclusion, I can see no compelling r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32525951557 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13472275518 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0707126869 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142464394665 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443979111243 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322329036017 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826859558098 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111942656868 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.