Many people work from home using modern technology today. Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employers. Do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to the advances in technological innovation, remote working has gained popularity among organizations in many parts of the world. While some people hold their belief that this development only has positive influences on employees and not companies, I completely disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, telecommuters value working from home because they can manage their time flexibly. In other words, they are able to set their own deadlines and plan when to work or carry on domestic responsibilities such as picking up children from school. Another advantage is a reduction in expenditure. It can be explained by the fact that many working people can save a large amount of money and time spent on formal clothing as well as traveling to work. As a result, it not only helps reduce stress but also increases efficiency as employees no longer have to deal with rush-hour traffic on a daily basis.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that this modern type of working also benefits businesses. Firstly, it allows organizations to hold online conferences or make instant video calls through platforms such as Zoom or Google Meetings. Therefore, implementing new technological advances contributes to effective time and cost management, meanwhile, these resources can be allocated to further investments. In terms of recruitment, teleworking enables businesses to attract more talents regardless of their location. Employers are more likely to recruit candidates with the exact qualifications and experiences without considering where they live. Moreover, this also increases the diversity of the workforce as well.
For all the reasons mentioned above, I maintain the opinion that both working people and organizations benefit from remote working. As long as workers develop a strong sense of discipline, this development will be embraced by more corporations in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | nhungdph | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | deolkuljeet1991 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | deolkuljeet1991 | 61 | view |
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for a country while some think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Many people think that is unnecessary to teach children handwriting skills in this technology ages To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of four different species of fish between 1982 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at lea 89
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41694915254 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09796756683 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3522612927 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264636152804 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721935897549 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06311906581 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155459555729 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464413084309 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.