The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.

The line graph provides information about the number of visitors traveling a Caribbean island from the years 2010 and 2017.
To commence with, visitors on ships in 2011 was 0.5 million which was gradually increased by 1 million in 2014 and continuously escalating to 105 million visitors in the year 2016 whereas, visitors staying on the island had around 0.7 million tourists and from the year 2012 to 2016 the numbers of visitor was same around 1.2 million. Furthermore, both cruise ship and island visitors intersected at 1.4 million.
Additionally, the total of both visitors in 2011 has 1.3 million and increased to 2.5 million and in 2014 and kept constant till the year 2016 which was up to 2.45 million.
Overall, it is clearly noticed in the line graph that visitors staying on cruise ships, island and total on their highest point in the year 2017 was respectively, 2 million, 1.5 million and 3.5 million and in the initial year cruise ship visitors were lowest on 0.3 million visitors whereas island visitors were at around 0.7 million and the total was 1 million visitors.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-11 lnthuyvan 73 view
2022-12-09 nijam view
2022-09-19 Dida18 73 view
2022-06-08 Poopie 73 view
2022-04-23 Cicihg 61 view
Essays by user Amityy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
...n the initial year cruise ship visitors were lowest on 0.3 million visitors whereas island ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54448227853 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.493089924 43.030603864 271% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.0 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757496526133 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749647428127 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906620153891 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856616222397 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985698028894 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.