Question :Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Who can deny the importance of the workers in a community? As we all know, workers are the symbol of industrialization and new civilization in our era. Therefore, no one can deny their influence on our modern age. In this regard, there is a controversial topic among people that asking different kinds of duties in the workplace from workers is so beneficial not only for employers but also for workers, while others believe that doing similar tasks in the workplace is a logical manner since workers can do their tasks professionally. I certainly agree with the first idea rather than the second one because of two reasons, which will be presented here.
First, From my perspective, working in a constant situation is so boring. As we all experienced, doing a task that we do repeatedly causes a decrease in our concentration on that task, and our efficiency becomes low. By contrast, a person who does different tasks in the workplace can gain a great number of experiences that are so beneficial for them. They are able to become a multi-skilled person that he or she has plenty of chance to the promotion and get top positions, such as management and supervisory positions.
Second, doing a similar task in the work reduces workers' creativity that causes they cannot to follow their dreams. We all hear and read in the magazines and news that one worker in the far distance factory has found a way for increasing the productivity of a factory by inventing a tool or a method. When we focus on his or her work condition, we find out that he or she is so active in the workplace, and they were always changing his workplace, and by using their experience and creativity, they managed to find this method. Another aspect that is worth mentioning is that these kinds of workers are reliable and loyal to that group, and managers depend on their experiences and skills; therefore they have more stability in their job, and during the downturn, they have less chance for firing
In conclusion, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that doing different types of tasks in the workplace enhances is so exciting for workers, and they can gain new experiences for promotion as well as this approach opens their horizon about work issues, and they can foster their creativity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Question Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 73
- It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 76
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 73
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examp 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80710659898 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86893655909 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.636697134 48.9658058833 277% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.692307692 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3076923077 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274296916628 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860753212784 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757234148041 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171435333885 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029627583491 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.