Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
In today's modern world, the Internet has been one of the most precious gifts that advanced technology has bestowed upon human beings. In this regard, the importance of the Internet and using this modern technology have become crucial issues for people. Some people are of the opinion that the effect and the importance of accessing the Internet are as other infrastructures such as building roads; therefore, governments should spend budget for this technology that all people have free Internet access, while others have a contradictory view about this matter. I subscribe to the first idea rather than the second one for quite a few reasons, two substantial ones of which will be elaborated hereunder.
The first debatable reason which is highly worthy of being highlighted here is the Internet decreases our dependence on other infrastructures. Nowadays, we can use the Internet for a great number of duties, and its existence brings about so convenient life for us. For instance, by means of the Internet, we can purchase a product in the Net environment and pay its bill through our Internet account by pressing some keys on the keyboard. On the other hand, for physical purchasing, we have to go to the shop and spend quite a little time buying something, which is a time-consuming and so expensive process compared to Internet-based shopping. In addition, in the traditional purchasing system, we have limited choices, and we do not have the ability to compare. Thus, Internet has a vital role in modern purchasing.
Another equally important point concerning this is issue is the fact that using the Internet is an eco-friendly approach. In the recent decades, because of using fossil fuels, our nature has become so polluted, and today's human has to use alternative means for reducing the effect of pollution in our lives. As a result, the Internet decreases our dependence on a great number of energy sources. Suppose a person that has to go to another city for a meeting. By means of the Internet, that person can communicate with other people. In addition, he or she does not spend any money on fuel and travel.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I believe that having the Internet is a vital means for any person and it has quite a few beneficial gains not only for people but also for our nature
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- At a sale at a private home in California several years ago 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 88
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91878172589 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81562123711 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502538071066 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.718848676 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194386161645 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669051613149 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609625923785 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120024757558 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447275153039 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.