Some people believe that social media sites, such as Facebook or Twitter, have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way.
It is believed that social media platforms could bring a damaged impact for teenager, because it brings affect to brain and creates addiction. This behavior keeps them away from their friends, because they have a tendency to talk with their virtual mate in social media platform. However, if people use it wisely, it will give a good impact for youngster, because social media provides many valuable information which is very important for teenager as an asset to live in community.
Nowadays, almost all people have social media. According to research by The New York Times, the most popular newspaper in the US, in 2020, almost all people in productive ages or millennial group, they have one social media. But, the research told that this platform produces people to stay away from their family. They tend to live with their mobile phone for the whole of the day, instead of have chit-chat with people whom they love. In addition, social media have potential to create hoax become more popular in the future. Because, people tends to write anything without hesitation, when they stay alone in their private room.
On the other hand, social media could be beneficial for generation millennial and z. Because, Facebook or Twitter are the fastest path to gain information from various country. So, young people will reach many knowledges through social media. In addition, as we know, social media only need the internet provider to access several sites. Putting more simply, it is cheaper way for young people to learn and study for the brighter future. Furthermore, social media becomes the vital bridge for young couple who live separately. In the past, people used mail to contacts other. it is not effective way in the modern era.
In conclusion, social media could be double-knife edge for youngster. It could bring a good impact and vice versa. Where possible, the government should enact the law to banned hoax information to avoid young people be influenced by these sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | nahid_tavasspli | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 87
- The chart below shows the proportion of businesses making e commerce purchases by industry in Canada between 2015 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it 56
- The chart below shows the proportion of businesses making e commerce purchases by industry in Canada between 2015 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much valuable information', 'a good deal of valuable information'.
Suggestion: much valuable information; a good deal of valuable information
...oungster, because social media provides many valuable information which is very important for teenager as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...st, people used mail to contacts other. it is not effective way in the modern era....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04242424242 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4133467269 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2539938941 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335276857227 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108237848362 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478409900542 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203425356771 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040031148966 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much valuable information', 'a good deal of valuable information'.
Suggestion: much valuable information; a good deal of valuable information
...oungster, because social media provides many valuable information which is very important for teenager as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...st, people used mail to contacts other. it is not effective way in the modern era....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04242424242 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4133467269 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2539938941 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335276857227 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108237848362 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478409900542 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203425356771 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040031148966 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.