There are various views about the impact of social networks on young people. Some people believe they have negative effects on youngsters' abilities of making real friendship, while others would argue that they are a helpful way of connecting with other people. Personally, I think although social networks have both positive and negative effects, the positive sides outweigh the negative ones.
When it comes to negative impacts of social media, some people cite its unfavorable effects on the youths' communication skills, which I also agree to some extent especially in case of unwise using of these cyberspaces. This is because a real and meaningful relationship, apart from words and texts, is composed of other skills such as body language and eye contact, which contribute to express yourself and your feelings. With the increasing growth in using social media, young people have lost the opportunities to learn these important relationship constituents and lack these skills. Therefore, they are more dependent on chats and text messages rather than speaking face to face to start a conversation. Even, when they attend family gatherings, they usually tend to spend time with their mobiles instead of talking to family members.
However, in my view, social media beneficial impacts are much more noticeable. They provide opportunities to connect with people from all around the world, whom you may not meet in real world. They help to find people who have a lot in common with you or join such groups and forums, share your ideas in mutual fields of interest, or adopt others' useful ideas spreading in those communities. As a result, in my conviction if social networks were used wisely, they can be a really useful way of creating a healthy communication.
In conclusion, despite having some drawbacks, social media sites are beneficial in numerous ways which cannot be overlooked. However, their downsides also can be reduced by using them sensibly.
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 67
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 84
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015 78
- Nowadays many children have trouble paying attention in class or concentrating on their school work Why is this happening How can this problem be solved 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...ple cite its unfavorable effects on the youths communication skills, which I also agre...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
... and text messages rather than speaking face to face to start a conversation. Even, when they a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2246835443 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73050290797 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5903226353 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333538794787 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105416682915 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786560488054 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195690617054 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418028344863 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.