Parents should control the screen time of their children. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views on whether parents should limit the screen time of their children or not. Many people, these days do not consider a large amount of time spent watching TV is an alarming problem for their children. As far as I am concerned, the parents should control the screen time of their kids for several reasons.
To begin with, there are several reasons why I suppose that spending a lot of time sitting in front of screens would harm the children. First and foremost, children’s health can be seriously affected. In other words, some diseases related to vision as well as the nervous system are demonstrated because of spending much time playing games. According to the American Pediatric Association, overtime watching TV can slow down the development of a child’s nervous system. If they watch televisions and play games all the time, their eyes will become short-sighted. Moreover, they are prone to suffer from obesity due to the lack of outdoor activities.
Secondly, another reason is that some popular PC games and videos which are widely spread on social networks contain several violent content. As a result, children are easily tempted into social manipulation and the consequence of this is a significant increase in juvenile delinquency. Additionally, the more time children play games, the less time they spend on studying as well as social life. Excessive TV watching and playing pastimes discourage children from reading books and informative articles. Therefore, these make children not only go away from real life but also focus on imaginary life which appears in games and videos.
In conclusion, it seems to me that excessive screen time has negative impacts on both the mental and physical health of children. Hence, the parents should put the screen time of their children into limitation to ensure good health and studying performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subject which do not adequately prepare students for the realistic demands of modern working world To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- Q4 these days consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from various companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertising What measures should be taken to protect them 84
- The chart below shows the proportion of renewable energy in the total energy supply of 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
- causes and effects of Internet addiction 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life which appears in games and videos. In conclusion, it seems to me that exces...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18300653595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69969454464 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6906517883 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.125 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350748849957 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11734367658 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113681729823 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240168239343 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139041003184 0.056905535591 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.