The reading and the lecture have a discussion on how humpback whales migrate long distances. The reading mention three potential theories. On the contrary, the lecturer considers none of them would be effective with certainty.
First, the reading suggests that humpback whales utilize stars to navigate. However, the opinion has been opposed by the professor with new proof. The professor says that there is no direct evidence showing the connection, ducks also use stars to navigate but they are not as intelligent as humpback whales. The opinion has been challenged heavily.
Moreover, the article claims that humpback whales go in straight lines is one reason. On the other hand, the professor says that humpback whales are attracted by the earth's magnetic field, not because of stars, which differs from the reading as well.
Finally, the author believes that humpback whales floating straight up are looking at stars, while the professor in the listening material maintains that other animals do such activity with a different purpose. In addition, humpback whales usually float straight up during the day when there are no stars. Thus, the reading passage has been refuted again.
Therefore, the speaker departs totally from the opinions on the topic made in the reading.
- TPO50Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the p 70
- TPO 45 Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO49 Humpback whales 70
- TPO32 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 78
- TPO53Independent Task Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy pro 85
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 204 250
No. of Characters: 1045 1200
No. of Different Words: 121 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.779 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.123 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.38 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.692 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.013 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.384 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4