The line graph provides information about the number of marriages and divorces in the UK from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, while the number of 1st marriages saw a declining trend, the two remaining were 2nd marriages and divorces experienced slight increases in number. Therefore, the total marriages was high in early years and then decreased gradually in the later years. And in the end, the total marriages witnessed a slight rise in number.
Starting at about 500 in 1975, the total was higher than the beginning numbers of 1st marriages, it was just around 330. Between 1975 to 1985, the total marriages increased significantly in the number from about 500 to around 620. Likewise, the 1st marriages saw a considerable growth in the number from about 330 to 400 in the same period of years. In 1985 to 1990, there was a steady trend in the number of total marriages. Similarly, the 1st marriages experienced the same trend in the same years. From 1990 to 2000 witnessed a slight fall in the number of total marriages and then rose a little bit in the end. In contrast, the number of 1st marriages experienced a significant decline in number from 400 to 310 in the same period.
The initial number of 2nd marriages was at about 150 and also higher than the starting point of divorces, it was about 80, the lowest among the three others. Between 1975 to 1985, the number of 2nd marriages saw a slight climb in number from about 150 to 220. Similarity, the number of divorces also witnessed a significant increase in number in the same period. Between 1985 to 1995, the number of 2nd marriages fell moderately in number to about 205. By contrast, there was a continuous surge in the number of divorces and also overtook 2nd marriages, it was about 230 in 1995. And the period from 1995 to 2000 both 2nd marriages and divorces experienced an increased trend in number.
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 87
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The line graph below shows the monthly ridership of four separate transportation forms in a European metropolitan area between 1980 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 90
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...mber of total marriages and then rose a little bit in the end. In contrast, the number of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 33.7804878049 222% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 328.0 196.424390244 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7012195122 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60144419461 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.356707317073 0.547539520022 65% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.33902439024 323% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6496925662 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380316920584 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167382530492 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111108042272 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313762977735 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120048609946 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...mber of total marriages and then rose a little bit in the end. In contrast, the number of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 33.7804878049 222% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 328.0 196.424390244 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7012195122 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60144419461 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.356707317073 0.547539520022 65% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.33902439024 323% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6496925662 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380316920584 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167382530492 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111108042272 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313762977735 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120048609946 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.