As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Today, public transportation is an inevitable part of a metropolitan city. There is a discussion about whether governments should encourage public transportation instead of personal vehicles. I would like to deal with this issue from an environmental perspective.
Needless to say, we are collectively facing a major problem called climate change. This problem has a serious impact on our planet, therefore we need to take action. Both natural and human-made factors can cause climate change and global warming. Governments and legal organizations should take precautions against these human-made causes in order to slow down climate change.
One of the major reasons for climate change is carbon footprints. When people use their own cars they emit CO2 gas which is a harmful gas for the world. On the other hand, public transportation emits less CO2 per person. To illustrate this point, we can examine numerous scientific research that deal with the impact of carbon footprint. There is an urgent need for us to reduce our carbon footprint.
The arguments I have presented suggest that it is more logical to encourage public transportation rather than building more roads. Governments should focus on environmental issues instead of financial benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
- Is experiential learning learning by doing a better approach as compared to formal education Do you agree or disagree 55
- Some universities deduct students marks if assignment is given late What is your opinion and suggest alternative actions 77
- With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and giv 77
- Is experiential learning learning by doing a better approach as compared to formal education Do you agree or disagree 77
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job Do you agree or disagree 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 196.0 242.827586207 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47448979592 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05122089984 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9307965097 50.4703680194 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6428571429 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.25397266985 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158741018995 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523113864661 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501839506856 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101117652331 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579247112352 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.