The line graph illustrates the amount of electricity production from three different sources of energy which New Yorkers used from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the number of people in New York who consumed petroleum and natural gas increased enormously over the period shown. In contrast, there was a considerable decline in the figures for ones who used coal in this city.
Consumed about 350kwh by New Yorkers in 1980, Petroleum was by far the highest sources of energy which supplied New York city. New York experienced a sharp fluctuation in the amount of electricity production from petroleum before rocking sharply over the last period of 10 years and reached a peak of 700kwh in the last year.
Turning to coal and natural gas, from 1980 to 1985, New York witnessed a climb up in the number of people using coal. However, there was a period of stability in the amount of electricity produced from natural gas before it surged significantly and overtook that from coal over the last period of the mentioned years.
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 64
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 73
- The graph reveals the amount of consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with some prediction until 2030 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90751445087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60290243239 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49710982659 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0361103437 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342417097741 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165119291899 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130529912557 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230107346543 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140173873614 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.