In the modern world, adolescents are likely to commit petty crimes because an influence of the internet. The majority of people regard that juvenile offender should be treated as adult lawbreakers. Personally, i partly agree with this point of view.
To a certain extent, teenagers who commit crimes should recieve the same level of punishments as mature ones. But we must consider about the aspect of lacking experience and knowledge of the youngsters. Furthermore, young people tend to copy adult's behaviours without being aware of the adverse consequences that they have to suffer. A salient example can be seen in the countryside of Vietnam, where local people have no much chance to access to the internet or even been taught about laws, as a result, numernous adolescents ride a motorbike illegally and some of them frequently have a crash with others. Thus, giving these juvenile offenders a harsh sentence is deemed not a fair trail.
On the other hand, other individuals believe that the legislative branch should treat adolescents as equal as grown people, because due to the advanced technologies, most of teenagers are informed about the consequences of breaking laws. In addition, the adverse influences of these crimes are serious equally. Moreover, if young perpetrators recieve a lighter sentence than mature offenders that would be the disadvantge, because it is not sufficiently strict, especially felons.
The legislative branch should treat juvenile crimes as equal as mature ones. While, others regard they should be lenient for some rationales.
Personally, i reckon young offenders should not treat as same as grown people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... partly agree with this point of view. To a certain extent, teenagers who commi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ide of Vietnam, where local people have no much chance to access to the internet o...
^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Thus, giving these juvenile offenders a harsh sentence is deemed not a fair t...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le offenders a harsh sentence is deemed not a fair trail. On the other hand,...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teenagers') or simply say ''most teenagers''.
Suggestion: most of the teenagers; most teenagers
...cause due to the advanced technologies, most of teenagers are informed about the consequences of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 13, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nient for some rationales. Personally, i reckon young offenders should not treat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, i reckon, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34865900383 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84482694119 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5663320589 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267949307158 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093241517346 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716994884873 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16337548219 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432487583907 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.