Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
In the proliferation of the cutting-edge technology, working and learning driven by technology for adults and school-aged children is feasible. As far as I am concerned, this is a partly positive development.
On the one hand, the option of staying at home for their work and studying is attractive to some reasons. Firstly, it saw the dramatic surge in hazard for both children and the elders. This is perfectly exemplified in case that in the breakdown of the epidemic of covid 19, social distancing by working from home when doing business is allowed to ensure the safety between individuals to avoid being positive to pandemic. The second reason may be not only the older but also to promote juveniles to broaden their horizon about new access to latest technology. This could be explanied by the fact that with the aid of technology, adults and the youth have a plethora of golden opportunities of researching many websites to enhance their career prospect and scholastic achievements respectively.
Despite some benefits, I maintain there are some drawbacks of technology. The first, people may not stand a high chance of giving exposure to the real world. This is because individuals particularly white-collar workers and students have a tendency to be glued their eyes on screen with the substaintial amount of time. As a consequence, it is likely that they would become more inactive and introvert to their society. In addition, in regarding to children, it experiences a risky jeopardy on academic performance. By showing a principal example, they are capable of taking advantage of Internet to be in search solutions for their classroom-assignment and homework. As a result, the vast majority of teenagers have no ability to master and foster their knowledge and interpersonal thinking.
To sum up, for the reasons I have mentioned above, working and learning at home brings people definite advantages thanks to technology. Nevertheless, it also brings about some infinite disadvantages. It is advisable for everyone to expand their rapport and socialization rather than isolate at home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime Do you agree or disagree 11
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 84
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 26
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
... broaden their horizon about new access to latest technology. This could be explanied by ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endency to be glued their eyes on screen with the substaintial amount of time. As...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23738872404 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16872267456 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581602373887 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5114328077 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.823529412 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182367853436 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476603060064 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04472063655 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994842004102 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324343634509 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.