The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturers’ total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of total car sales by manufacturers in various areas between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the proportions of total car sales in Asia and Europe were higher than in other nations, while the figure for total car sales in North America declined over the given period.
In 2006, 35% of manufacturers’ car sales were in Asia, and it remained the same in 2007. Although the proportion then rose slightly to 38% in 2008, it fell to 30% at the end of the period. In Europe, the proportion of total car sales doubled over the given period, from 25% in 2006 to 50% in 2010.
There was a significant decrease in the percentage of total car sales in North America. The figure in 2006 was 29%; and then continued dropping down to 23% and 22% in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The figure then declined considerably to 9% at the end of the period. Despite a fall in 2007 and 2008, total car sales in South America in 2010 then recovered to the figure 2006 of 11%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | mandy49 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-15 | Lâm Yên Chi | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | cuchuoj2001 | view | |
| 2020-04-29 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 72 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 93 | view |
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n various areas between 2006 and 2010. Overall, it is clear that the proportion...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merica declined over the given period. In 2006, 35% of manufacturers’ car sales...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riod, from 25% in 2006 to 50% in 2010. There was a significant decrease in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49462365591 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56033675811 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3834585553 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414817384841 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197317019688 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141383787695 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295117054196 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731270451478 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n various areas between 2006 and 2010. Overall, it is clear that the proportion...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merica declined over the given period. In 2006, 35% of manufacturers’ car sales...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riod, from 25% in 2006 to 50% in 2010. There was a significant decrease in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49462365591 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56033675811 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3834585553 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414817384841 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197317019688 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141383787695 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295117054196 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731270451478 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.