The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Who does not like a compliment? We tend to become more receptive to positive words compared to negative. Human brains like to hear more positive feedback. Hence I believe that any change can be brought in only through positive actions.
In today's workplace, positive psychological capital is considered as one of the most important asset. Fred Luthens, the psychologist who coined the term "Psychological capital" insists that only positive actions of a mentor would bring a sustainable and productive change within his team members. On the contrast, negative tone from a Manager would not result in the expected change. Going by this theory, I can assert that than negative actions, positive actions can bring in a dramatic improvement in bringing up a change.
Positive reinforcements could bring in a more conducive environment wherein the listener is more receptive and open to discuss all his limitations. By this weaknessess of a listener can be discussed with a open mindset and addressed with possible solutions. By talking positively, a trainer builds a good relationship with his or her trainee. This helps in resolving many of the issues faced by the trainer not only more fastly but also more effectively.
Having said that the positive way of training would help the trainee express more, the flip side would be its ineffciency in bringing up the trainee in more holistic way.
While I state that praising positive actions is the better way, its not the only best way to develop an individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 33
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ns like to hear more positive feedback. Hence I believe that any change can be brough...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ess of a listener can be discussed with a open mindset and addressed with possibl...
^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ing positive actions is the better way, its not the only best way to develop an ind...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 248.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13306451613 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01373190493 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9213030687 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9285714286 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161696380503 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588646796309 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462745460572 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103005132775 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504287984939 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.