The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO¬2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how much carbon dioxide was produced by each individual in four different countries during the period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there was a general downward trend in the amount of CO2 in both the UK and Sweden, whereas Italy and Portugal showed a reverse pattern. It is also clear that Sweden experienced a dramatic change in CO2 emissions compared to the other countries.
In the first year, British residents emitted approximately 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide, followed by a continuous decrease to end at around 8.5. Over the same period, the total output of CO2 in Sweden started at over 8 metric tonnes, after which its figure increased noticeably to hit its highest point of just over 10 metric tonnes in the following ten years before witnessing a tremendous fall to roughly 5.5 at the end of the period.
In comparison, 4 metric tonnes was the average amount of CO2 in the United Kingdom at the beginning, which was nearly four times as high as that of Portugal. Afterwards, the figures for these two countries went up continually to just under 8 and 5 metric tonnes respectively in 1997. Ten years later, there was no change in CO2 emissions for the former, but the latter showed a slight rise to almost 5.5 metric tonnes.
- Your town council has decided to demolish an historic building due to lack of funds to renovate Write a letter to your counselor In your letter you should say why it is important to preserve the historic building how the funds could be generated 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 79
- traffic jam 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80909090909 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61963343597 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.154462484 43.030603864 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123491399747 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648854151066 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419135992002 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838292867528 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404596495355 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80909090909 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61963343597 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.154462484 43.030603864 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123491399747 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648854151066 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419135992002 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838292867528 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404596495355 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.