4. Whether children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets?
Whether children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets? There is various voice. Some parents might remain negative concerning its distraction from school work. However, I consider there are enormous advantages attached to it, and it will present an excellent lesson for a young age.
First and foremost, taking care of pets can build up responsibility. The sense of responsibility is so indispensable for future success, and the time with pets, to a certain degree, offer children the chance to reach this maturity. For example, dog walking, feeding, and training the dog to shit in the right place are routine tasks for a dog family. Besides all this daily, the necessary obligation includes bringing the dog to the clinic for a regular check. If parents share some part of the work, children can realize their pets’ lives depend so much on how they perform workloads. Therefore, the sense of responsibility occurred more readily in children engaged in all these chores of taking care of pets.
Secondly, enhancing compassion is another core value. When children play with pets, the differentiated perception of how self feels and others feel can be cultivated. Under these circumstances, children will gradually discover the right way to interact with the outside world and how to care about another living creature. For example, young age cannot force their pets to do whatever merely makes them happy. Instead, they have to investigate whether everything they deliver with kindness and good intention from the reaction of your pets. The empathy feelings for others acquire while a good relationship with the pet is built. And the children who learn how to care about their pets, it is no secret that they are simultaneously earning the capacity to understand and respect people from various backgrounds. Conversely, no pet family children develop less so due to environmental settings.
Thirdly, pets time produces a joyful experience. Like anything else that matters, happiness is the lesson everyone should learn as early as possible. The little being who stays at your home can create a vibrant dynamic and teach everybody how to be happy. The little friend can serve as a living alarm to wake up a bright morning. Pets also offer companionship to kids at night, lying on their bedroom floor. And what is even more important, they help children detach from devices. Your son could go jogging or go swimming with his little buddy, compared addicting to computer games. A family with pets can often have a more quality family environment than those families that don’t have one, indicating a national survey of 2022. So, I am convinced the benefit of having pets may be beyond what we can see, for it promotes the level of happiness and wellbeing.
All in all, I am a voter for every family with kids who should have pets. I believe the relationship with a pet shows a three-edged advantage, and it will significantly benefit children's growth and internalize precious qualities at an early age.
- school structured activities provide a positive effect on children s growth 90
- I encourage university art students to take science related classes 90
- Whether parents should arrange a lot of extra activities outside school 61
- Children should allow having a pet 80
- teachers are more important than facilities 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le from various backgrounds. Conversely, no pet family children develop less so d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2523.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.046 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75497731388 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0428758676 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2413793103 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31034482759 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368916233831 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1019752193 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181330411749 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21463519327 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103777798942 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.