school structured activities provide a positive effect on children's growth
There is a debate among educators and parents about whether children should allow doing whatever they want after school. Some people believe it is the best way for kids, for it is to render a genuine carefree childhood. However, other groups of people advocate that school structured activities benefit kids' mental and physical development more. And parents should do more to support the school guideline. As far as I concern, I support the latter one.
Firstly, school structured learning allows kids to form good habits. Children are at this particular stage of life where they have little self-control and cannot behave without supervision from their teachers. To better lead them, designing the proper amount of homework or engaging activities will be beneficial. Under the school framework, kids will gradually know what an appropriate response in a class is and how to complete their assignments punctually daily. Under the guidance, kids involved in certain school activities unconsciously form a set of good behavior. In contrast, most students don’t know how to arrange their free time by themselves, especially the middle-level and low-level students. Thus, school activities avoid them from wasting time.
Secondly, school structured learning prepares kids to communicate better with others. It is not hard to imagine that children spend most of their time at school, and school is the best place to practice their communication skills. So, when kids participate in school activities, they have an excellent opportunity to bond with other kids. Through teamwork, kids could observe others and identify a viable way to deliver the message and meet agreement. They will learn how to present their opinions and respect others’ opinions respectively during the process. Similarly, homework can also view as communicational a channel, that catalyzes kids’ discussions with their teacher. Thus, school activities can enhance interaction and train kids to be good communicators.
Thirdly, school structured learning can decelerate adolescents' emotional issues. Sure, most people assume that if students got autonomy, they would explore the subjects or knowledge fascinating them most. But the reality is crucial. Unfortunately, most kids fill the time gap by watching TV or playing computer games; even worse, some students get addicted to entertainment. Because of this, as a new emerging situation, worried parents attempt to restrict their children's smartphone time. For, accessing the internet and watching hateful speeches or toxic opinions harms their kids' emotions. In contrast, well-designed outdoor activities will significantly associate body and teamwork with others. It is an energy-consuming and workable way for cellphone addictions. To some extent, this will mitigate the emotional issue of this new generation.
All in all, I believe that school structured activities are beneficial for children's growth.
- Whether parents should arrange a lot of extra activities outside school 61
- 4 Whether children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets 90
- school structured activities provide a positive effect on children s growth 90
- I encourage university art students to take science related classes 90
- children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets 3 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63288288288 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96268610012 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5703609383 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2413793103 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3103448276 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86206896552 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226620435184 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656225033518 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778151552197 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173142155733 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929882995508 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.78 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.