the school year should be rearranged
Whether the school year should be rearranged and benefit the majority of the students, has long been the center of public attention. Some people advocate that students have 9 months and then take a 3-month break, while others hold the opposite opinions, regarding 3month of school and one month of rest is the best schedule. From my perspective, I consider both reasonable, but I prefer to conduct the first kind of schedule.
Firstly, the long consecutive learning period can benefit a good learning habit more. As we all know, certain good habits will greatly impact efficacy in work and learning. K12 students, who are at the developmental stage, need to establish fixed routines and behavior patterns. Compared with the 3-month school arrangement, the 9 months learning plan needs children to spend 3 times of their time in school and then teachers can assist the good habit to form during a longer period of interaction. Similarly, university students, who enter their adulthood, require more time to build a sense of persistence and resilience. If they continue to focus on their subjects or projects undertaking, then they will better collaborate with their schoolmate or professors and assess their outcomes within a longer cycle of time. Therefore,9 monthly plan can form a good habits and boost the self-efficacy of students of all ages.
Secondly, the longer school can provide a particular scenario for students training their communication skills. If you ask, what are those most important skills crucial for the next generation to master? People are most likely to admit that communication skills can be the top 3. The longer school can provide more interaction between students than spending time home alone. With 3 months of school time, students merely start to know each other, and then the coming holiday will break new-formed regular interaction. However, given 9 month period of time school time, both kids and university students can build trust and rapport with other students. Then, under this circumstance, they will find a better way to practice their communication skills led by the proper guidance of teachers.
Thirdly, the 3-month break can offer a more flexible out-of-school learning program. The concept is that the learning process could happen wherever stimulate the learners’ motivation. Educators will arrange more engaging activities or even encourage students to learn outside school, such as traveling or camping. With higher mobility of the world population, we know travel to foreign countries is more accessible. Therefore, the 3-month-available break guarantees students a more flexible time to arrange a trip to explore the oversea countries. This will really benefit those students who like to learn from real interaction with the learning topic.
All in all, I genuinely advise the authority can prioritize student growth over other elements of school management and be more adaptive to the school time arrangement. And, 9-month learning school year play a more effective way to benefit the student's growth, considering the self-efficacy, communication skills and providing a better chance for students’ out school time arrangement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plan'
Suggestion: to plan
...hool arrangement, the 9 months learning plan needs children to spend 3 times of thei...
^^^^
Line 6, column 542, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lar interaction. However, given 9 month period of time school time, both kids and university s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 192, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to school'
Suggestion: to school
...time arrangement. And, 9-month learning school year play a more effective way to benef...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...lay a more effective way to benefit the students growth, considering the self-efficacy, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38323353293 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88971224361 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530938123752 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0170696174 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.88 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.04 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179498658459 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548153849195 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964666340809 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126274498914 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895271754871 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.