international forest fund
The article consists of several suggestions to help protect the world's forests by development of an international forest protection fund. The lecturer believes this theory is flawed and it will not reduce deforestation rates. His further demonstrations are as follows.
Firstly, despite what the reading passage claims, agriculture itself is a threat to forest ecosystems. As the population grows in agricultural areas, the farmers are forced to enhance their harvest yields by using modern technologies. This involves actions which can endanger forests such as pesticide use. Subsequently, promoting agriculture might be even more dangerous for forests than logging.
Secondly, dispersing funds to forest owners cannot be beneficial either because the forest owners are in fact governments rather than forest dwellers themselves. Moreover, There is no guarantee that the funds delieverd to the governments will be used in the path of forest protection.
Finally, in the case of acquiring an international fund to enhance biodiversity in forests, it is more likely that people and governments use that fund to grow more commercial plants rather than the species which contribute to the biodiversity of the ecosystem.
Collectively, none of the suggestions provided in the reading passage seem beneficial to conserve the forests using an international fund system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-24 | ayumiyazaki | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 81 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Ali_Majlesi | 85 | view |
- assigning projects to students alone or as a team 83
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 73
- TPO 44 integrated archaeologists believe that there were no coins in a site because the site is really far away Coins were useless And no coins have been found in other places 80
- is taking a lot of time making an important decision a good guality or a bad one 81
- leadership naturally or acquied 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, well, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71219512195 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16348139163 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0392797377 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465271778213 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161047515895 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139280284891 0.0662205650399 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26101758736 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834782871916 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, well, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71219512195 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16348139163 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0392797377 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465271778213 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161047515895 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139280284891 0.0662205650399 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26101758736 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834782871916 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.