The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013

The bar graph compares the number of Internet users in Greece, Canada, Denmark, and worldwide on average over 15 years starting in 1998.

On the whole, looking at the graph, it is immediately apparent that an upward trend has been observed in the number of Internet users in all countries and the global average. It is also notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark recorded the highest figure.

In 1998, nearly 26,000 people in Canada accessed the internet. Which makes them the group with the highest rate of users for the period. Meanwhile, that number for Danish was relatively smaller at roughly 22,000. Surged both numbers in 2003, yet Denmark overtook the dominant figure of Canada to have the largest number of Internet users until the end of the period, reaching 95,000 people as compared to 88,000 in Canada.

Greece had the lowest number of Internet users, at only 3 thousand in 1988, However, the figure for Greek progressed gradually to reach 63,000 in 2013, which left that number of the word average behind with only 35,000.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-06 Nguyễn Đinh Tường Vi view
2023-07-06 Nguyễn Đinh Tường Vi view
2023-05-23 Nguyên-MTTN 78 view
2022-12-16 MAI THỊ LAN ANH view
2022-05-04 jadenguyen 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...so notable that during the period shown with the exception of 1998, Denmark recorded the highest figu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, while, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93406593407 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25665701995 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4230262825 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227172458251 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102056689476 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540320013781 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150785040897 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304069349757 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.