Many people believe that it is pointless to teach children handwriting skills in modern times. While there might be some supporting arguments, I still disagree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems reasonable simply because modern technologies could encourage environmental protection. For example, Some students who study at school do not use the amount of paper, such as notebooks and books. As a result, it may reduce trees which cut down for paper manufacture.
In spite of the arguments above, I highly go against this view for the following reasons. Firstly, handwriting is a basic skill to study other subjects in school. For instance, Most children learn to handwrite in primary school before they study math and foreign languages. Thus, students who can not write find it difficult to do exercises in math and English. Another reason is that children who learn to type too early might cause some problems. To illustrate, many children often sit in front of their computers every day to study and do homework. Consequently, they suffer from health problems, including bad eyesight and back problems.
In conclusion, I recognize possible arguments to accept the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe that this idea is unreasonable
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 51
- The pie charts compare the percentages of water consumption in 5 sectors in Sydney in 1997 and 2007 73
- In modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products for instance clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historic objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20853080569 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78550445379 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658767772512 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9849199166 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5384615385 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210371167815 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742802779895 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096834606318 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128387076166 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101449995092 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.