Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops. Is this a negative or positive development?
Nowadays, It is true that big shopping centers and supermarkets are more common compared to small local shops. While there might be some drawbacks, I would argue that this phenomenon has far more benefits.
On the one hand, this trend seems detrimental simply because the increasing presence of shopping centers and supermarkets could have a negative impact on children's spending habitats. For example, most children who go to shopping centers are addicted to luxury brands, such as Nike and Channel. As a result, they are more likely to pay more money for clothes, which may lead them into financial difficulties.
In spite of the arguments, I believe that benefits are more significant for the following reasons. Firstly, building more shopping centers and supermarkets provides people with recreational activities. To illustrate, Vietnamese people often take their children to game centers and cinemas in shopping centers to relax at the weekend. Hence, it may improve the social life of local people and make the city to become livable. Another reason is that The higher number of shopping centers and supermarkets creates more job opportunities for local communities. For instance, shopping centers and supermarkets always employ full-time as well as part-time employees. Thus, large shopping centers and supermarkets may improve the living standards of people and boost local economic development.
In conclusion, although I recognize the possible negative effects of the discussed trend, it seems to me that it is a negative development overall
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-02 | Vadesaer | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-01 | Mamun_291120 | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-06 | Kaur2000 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | quynhnhi280103 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | Chang_highlight | 61 | view |
- The plan below shows a city in 1950 and the city now 61
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
- Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people s prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people To what extent do you agree or disagree 49
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure This money should be used in new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45228215768 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92008302411 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2989273389 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457192262544 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157508089346 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998921061861 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245234246248 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918341657545 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.