The pie charts compare the percentages of water consumption in 5 sectors in Sydney in 1997 and 2007
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of water use in five fields in Sydney in two years, namely 1997 and 2007.
In general, there were a noticeable increase in the percentage of water consumption in service and household, while a downward trend can be seen if we look at the figures for manufacturing, building, and food. It is also clear that the figure for manufacturing was higher than for any other sector over the period shown.
At the beginning of the period, 33% of water was used in manufacturing, compared to only 23% in food and 20% in the building. Over the following 10 years, this country saw the proportion of water consumption in manufacturing drop slightly, to 33%. At the same period, the percentage of water used in food fell to 21%, and the figure for building decreased to 13 %
In 1997, the proportion of water used in household stood at 20%, while the figure for service was lower, at 16% respectively. After 10 years, the percentage of water consumption in household rose considerably, reaching 20%. In addition, service followed a similar trend to that of household, with figures increasing to 16%
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The pie chart below shows information about different types of pollutants entering in a particular area of ocean in 1997 and 2007 73
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95353627951 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1590656678 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273719095322 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11998527805 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096954020517 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18105681747 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955649109715 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.