The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. Dou you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that the preservation of ancient buildings in big cities in the world costs huge governments spending. This money should be spent in new social houses and roads. While there might be some supporting arguments, I still agree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems reasonable simply because many citizens in some countries are faced with housing and traffic problems. To take Ho Chi Minh City and other big cities as an example, traffic congestion is serious issues. Thus, the government should invest its money in sectors to address urgent problems
In spite of the arguments above, I highly go against this view for the following reasons. The first argument is that the preservation of old buildings could bring many benefits to the whole society. To illustrate, those buildings often create the identity of cities to attract tourists throughout the world. Hence, it is likely to boost the development of tourism, and this may provide employments and business opportunities for local people.
Another reason is that the government funding which costs the ancient buildings preserve the cultural and historical values of the country. For example, old buildings and historical sites are associated with events as well as architecture in the past. As a result, the government and citizens have to protect these buildings to keep traditional values for the next generations
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to accept the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe that this idea is unreasonable
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Pentland 67
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- The charts below describe the numbers of people per household in 1995 and 2005 of an European country 66
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 51
- The charts below show the percentage of working time in office spent on different tasks in the UK 1990 and 2000 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27843137255 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78048894989 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5310787196 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278420006515 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100727032114 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616100418995 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139976669101 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893923933354 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.