The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that the preservation of ancient buildings in big cities in the world costs huge governments spending. This money should be spent in new social houses and roads. While there might be some supporting arguments, I still agree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems reasonable simply because many citizens in some countries are faced with housing and traffic problems. To take Ho Chi Minh City and other big cities as an example, traffic congestion is serious issues. Thus, the government should invest money in sectors to address urgent problems
In spite of the arguments above, I highly go against this view for the following reasons. Firstly, the preservation of old buildings could bring many benefits to the whole society. To illustrate, those buildings often create the identity of cities to attract tourists throughout the world. Hence, it is likely to boost the development of tourism, and this may provide employments and business opportunities for local people.
Another reason is that the maintenance of ancient buildings preserves the cultural and historical values of the country. For example, old buildings and historical sites are associated with events as well as architecture in the past. As a result, the government and citizens protect old buildings to keep traditional values for the next generations
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to accept the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe that this idea is unreasonable
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- The charts below show qualification of graduates working in one advertising company in the year 1990 and 2010 67
- The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelbey between 1780 and 2000 78
- Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people s prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people To what extent do you agree or disagree 49
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 51
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32653061224 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82903374023 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595918367347 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7628137652 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276623340464 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981690281293 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634977318154 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138400694629 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901848089913 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.