The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelbey between 1780 and 2000.
The three pictures compare the layouts of the village of Kelbey in three years, namely 1780, 1860, and 2000.
It is clear that there were noticeable changes in the layout of this village over the period shown. The main modification included the removal of farmland as well as a wooded area, and the addition of many modern buildings.
Looking at the map in more detail, we can see that in 1780 there were 100 homes in the northeast of the map without traffic infrastructures. After 80 years, the new bridge and the road in the western part of the map were constructed in order to connect 200 homes with the other side of the river. In addition, the farmland and wooded area on the right side of the river were reduced in size to make way for many new infrastructures.
In 2000, many shops were built along the river, while a wetland for birds was also added. Furthermore, the residential area was expanded with 300 new homes. Finally, the farmland and wooded area were removed completely to give a place to new roads, two schools and three sport fields
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments expenditure This money should be used in new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 56
- In many places the role of mother and father is changing Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money is better to spend on human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The charts below show qualification of graduates working in one advertising company in the year 1990 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5873015873 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49938263982 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2212805857 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0876694349928 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040466377897 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673561042535 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758620128324 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836356604018 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.