The diagrams below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000.

The three maps illustrate the changes of the Kelsey village over a period of 220 years ( 1780-2000)
Overall, the village experienced considerable development during the period shown. The most noticeable differences between the three maps are the appearance of wetland for birds and the expansion of village in the year 2000.
As can be seen, the village was extended sharply from 1780 to 1860. By contrast, a massive amount of wood in the south of the village was cut down in the year 1860. A bridge was built across the river while the farms were shortened their size during this period. Also, a long road was constructed in the north of the farms in 1860.
Turning to the other features, we can see that farms and woods were demolished in the year 2000. However, in the same year, lots of new infrastructures such as school, sports field, shops, wetland for birds were constructed surrounding the village. Similarly, the builders added a bridge located parallelly the older across the river and they constructed a new road in the middle of Kelsey village to connect to different constructions in this area. Finally, the village continued to develop the size from 200 homes in 1860 to 500 homes in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-18 Vadesaer 78 view
2021-11-08 phongthe 73 view
2019-06-17 NhungNtdghtn 56 view
2018-09-04 venusrio 82 view
Essays by user phongthe :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elsey village over a period of 220 years 1780-2000 Overall, the village experien...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, similarly, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65165909314 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531400966184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9722639854 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191661180556 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784241330796 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072748175326 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138707825427 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555312125577 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.