Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems. Others think that there are more important issues. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ as to whether scientific studies should be responsible for addressing human health concerns. While some opposed that several pressing ones should not be neglected, I recite that people’s health is the top priority of science-based research.
It is undeniable that problems associated with people’s health are not the only consideration for scientists in some cases. This is because there are numerous alarming phenomenons should be addressed immediately, ranging from global warming, land degradation to water scarcity. Moreover, such issues themselves are also contributory factors resulting in health impairments in people directly. Once people and science ignore these existing phenomenons, there would be no time left for them to make efforts for changes.
However, scientific experiments should be held in order to resolve the plights on global health. First and foremost, humans are always considered as the principal manpower contributing to the development of all nation’s sectors. If such human sources are guaranteed good quality of health by scientific innovations, they will be able to devote themselves to their countries willingly. Secondly, such experiments should be conducted as a way to preserve people’s health from severe diseases. It is intended that the more developed the world is, the more complicated health problems people confront. Coronavirus, to illustrate, keeping spread its physical and mental nightmare with new mutations uncontrollably despite the relentless efforts from medicinal departments.
To conclude, there are opposing views about science-based studies should solely concentrate on tackling people’s health concerns or other issues. With these aforementioned ideas, I am side with the view that human life is still the top priority among all and more deserving of attention from scientific research.
- The graph below gives information about US government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 89
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 84
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your view 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, people’s opinions differ as to whether scientific studies should be responsibl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88043478261 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09842353761 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3740237502 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249398686013 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921925673877 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628074069601 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161033263002 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273021263488 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.