The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present
The given map illustrates how a residence hall changed from 2010 to the present.
Overall, it is clear that the residence hall witnesses a significant modernization. Most noticeably, car parking is converted into a garden, the addition of en-suite room and the increase in student bedroom.
In 2010, there were three gardens on the map including two located in the north and south, and the smaller one is next to the living room. Looking at the northeast of the area, there was a student bedroom, follow down there is a kitchen and another student bedroom. On the westward, there were a student bedroom and bathroom.
Now, the living room and the small garden in the north are replaced by new two student bedrooms, while the student bedroom in the north-east is remained unchanged. In the east, the kitchen adds a new area that is the social area, while in the south-east the student bedroom has remained stable, however, there is a new en-suite room are constructed next to the student bedroom. Finally, the student bedroom and the bathroom on the west remained at the same position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-01 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
- All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 74
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular country between 1978 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 73
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86021505376 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62717902006 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4307232749 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127877824328 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085357557676 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159661180355 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162995699165 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20277050248 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.