The percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in 4 countries in 1970 and 2000.
The bar chart shows changes in the number of male and female employees aged 60-64 in Belgium, the USA, Japan, and Indonesia in two different years, 1970 and 2020.
Overall, it can be seen that men employees always higher than women and the figures declined over the given period. In the meantime, women employees also experienced significant decreases throughout the two years.
In 1970, male workers registered the highest number in the USA, at 85% while the percentage of women staffs also had the highest rate, at about 78%. A little lower than this was seen in Indonesia where men employees almost reached the same figure as the United States, at roughly 79% and female workers stood at 65%. Men and women staffs in Belgium were at approximately 79% and 67% respectively. Lastly, male employees in Japan was 75% and the number of females in employment was around 52%, which stood at the lowest point in all.
After 50 years, all four countries had the men workers rate went down with the USA still remaining the most significant one, at roughly 80%. At the same time, Indonesian male employees had a drop of about 18%, followed by Japan and Belgium men staffs decreased to around 52% and 62% in turn. Women employees in Belgium displayed the most dramatic decline, at approximately 8% in 2020. American female workers experienced a roughly 10% decrease while the proportion of Japanese and Indonesian females in employment dropped to about 48% and 50% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | kashyap sahil | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 61
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60989181726 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4818059811 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174369872813 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071414497036 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448522317138 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110241926114 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277793566418 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60989181726 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4818059811 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174369872813 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071414497036 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448522317138 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110241926114 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277793566418 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.