It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. Agree or disagree?
In this day and age, sentiments diverge on whether it is impossible and futile for a country to demonstrate a university place for a high proportion of young people. Although some formidably censure this stance, I fervently advocate some rational reasons.
It is irrefutable that the government would cost a huge deal to provide teaching services to all university students. Furthermore, because there are too many universities for the government to care that can cause uncertainty in the quality and training facilities. For example, the government spends money on facilities, teachers, materials, and some other expenses. Besides, we cannot guarantee that most students will choose to attend college. The first reason may arise from the cost of studying, if the student's family has no economic conditions, it is difficult to choose this method. The second reason is that university is not the only path, after graduating from high school, students who want to be born early to earn money and gain practical experience can choose to go to vocational school or work as a worker.
On the other hand, if everyone is admitted to the university, it will lead to a shortage of the workforce and can take a huge toll on the economy. This is because college graduates rarely apply for jobs such as factory workers but instead look for jobs that match their major. Not only that, when too many students graduate from many universities, businesses cannot recruit all of them, leading to a large number of employees being unemployed.
In conclusion, I do not deny that going to college has many good sides but the idea of building more educational universities for a high proportion of young children is still disadvantageous and too unnecessary.
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...arise from the cost of studying, if the students family has no economic conditions, it i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... cannot recruit all of them, leading to a large number of employees being unemployed. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lege has many good sides but the idea of building more educational universities f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08362369338 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96722578357 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7362641862 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226390644112 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801433966619 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101911478326 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152762089891 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729417210887 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.