Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any

There is a growing tendency for the disappearance of several languages in the world. While it is the case that the fewer languages there are, the less challenging our life would be, the language dying out issue is worth considering.
People’s life could become easier when some minor languages are eliminated. To fulfil the civilisation of each nation, language plays a pivotal role, indicating the country’s manifestation. However, some languages are too sophisticated and not have any special value. The removal of such languages would leave only predominant ones which facilitate the language acquisition. Besides, when the nations which have their languages taken away have a command of the primary languages, they would have a greater opportunity to communicate and avoid being isolated.
The excessively declining number of languages, nevertheless, could brings some detrimental prospects in the future. Firstly, vanishing a language means that a country lose such an important element of their culture. It is evident that people know about a nation principally because of their language and location. A country having their language died out, therefore, might miss the chance to be spotted by foreigners. Secondly, most of the traditions, for example, folk musics or myths, have to be made by national language to reflect the cultural value. Without such traditional asset, the value system could be boringly bland.
In conclusion, although there are advantages of a small number of existed languages, it is necessary to maintain the diversity of languages and to restrict the language loss.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...umber of languages, nevertheless, could brings some detrimental prospects in the futur...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...usion, although there are advantages of a small number of existed languages, it is necessary to m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44979919679 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98515436693 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7499811035 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263504718618 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103310920936 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563751831857 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172750906195 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06247330943 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.