More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?
Expensive living cost is the primary issue people face after moving into urban areas and expecting a better life. Therefore, officials promoting public facilities could be a viable solution to tackle this problem.
One of the hardships people encounter after moving to big cities is the high living cost from the increasing demand while supplies remain. This encourages scarcity to emerge and creates competitiveness between prices. For instance, a 200-meter square house in Jakarta has cost more than 5 billion rupiahs after folding quadruple in the last four years. The skyrocketing housing price is the byproduct of the overcrowding population issue, which accounted for an average of 2 million people migrating to Jakarta yearly. Statistics show that 80% of Jakarta people find themselves struggling to buy houses for a living, encouraging them to pay for rent instead.
This problem could be tackled by encouraging officials to build a modern public infrastructure reducing the expense allocated to basic needs, such as health care costs. To be more specific, as people know that their basic necessities are being taken care of, they are able to distribute their funds to their secondary needs. For example, after Sweden free their health care and education charge, the sales of apartments rose steeply, indicating higher buying power although salaries remain unchanged. To put it more simply, healthcare and education house expenses made up more than 50% of the budget. Hence, freeing hospital bills and tuition fees saves a significant amount on household expenses.
In all, improving the quality of public facilities from the authority is one of the feasible solutions to tackle the high living cost problem faced by people migrating to large cities. If possible, allocating more budget to the establishment is necessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | Anh1405 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-04 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | NgocNhan.Englishteacher | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | mochimochi | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | mochimochi | 89 | view |
- The line chart conveys the proportion of viewers watching Channer one news several times counted in millions 73
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 11
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack sleep cause 67
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or Disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able solution to tackle this problem. One of the hardships people encounter af...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uraging them to pay for rent instead. This problem could be tackled by encoura...
^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ore specific, as people know that their basic necessities are being taken care of, they are able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38541666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77824431846 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9200501113 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183760683435 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563412187931 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467747003338 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106256419877 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301739621781 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able solution to tackle this problem. One of the hardships people encounter af...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uraging them to pay for rent instead. This problem could be tackled by encoura...
^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ore specific, as people know that their basic necessities are being taken care of, they are able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38541666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77824431846 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9200501113 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183760683435 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563412187931 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467747003338 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106256419877 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301739621781 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.