The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.

The first chart illustrates the figure of two genders that joined different evening programmes at one adult instruction center in 2009 while the second chart depicts the age information that embark the courses.
It is clear that women enjoyed language classes while men joined painting classes most in the first chart. 50 or over and 40-49 were the highest figures in second chart.
Looking for the bar chart, women joined language class with 40 people while men enjoyed this type of course comprised 20 people, a half lower than women. Followed by painting with 30 for women and 25 men attended this class. The number of drama was higher than the figure that of sculpture with 10 men in both of two groups while women joined with 20 people for drama class and 5 people for sculpture class, overall this data was higher than for men.
In term of pie chart, 50 or over was the highest group age accounted for 42%, followed by 40-49 with 26%, much lower than the highest figure. the percentage of 30-39 was higher than the figure that of 20-29 took up 16% and 11% respectively whilst aged under 20 was the lowest group with 5%, only 1/8 of the highest proportion.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-12 ESSEYWRITER 84 view
2023-03-13 hyst12 78 view
2022-09-24 kevann 73 view
2022-09-24 kevann 73 view
2022-09-24 kevann 89 view
Essays by user Taytor2609 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...6%, much lower than the highest figure. the percentage of 30-39 was higher than the...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, while, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62801932367 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18218501361 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2831508823 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190301640833 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992106147104 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607562069753 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129791260762 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561503558134 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.