Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People have been arguing about whether or not to use nuclear weapons. While there is some support for the advantages of nuclear weapons all over the world, from my point of view, I totally disagree with it.

First, using nuclear weapons isn't the best way to solve the problem. While nuclear weapons are directly dangerous to humans and the environment, the effects of nuclear weapons are also expensive. For example, when the first nuclear weapon was dropped, it was a fission bomb nicknamed "Little Boy" on Hiroshima. Three days later, the US Air Force dropped a fission bomb, nicknamed "Fat Man," on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The number of people killed has reached about 200,000. Building a city takes a very long time. However, for only a few seconds, the atomic bomb can take it all. Two cities were sunk in smog and many buildings were destroyed. People living in two cities were studying and working and were interrupted and faced the pain of losing loved ones, stripping them of joy as well as hope and leaving behind psychological scars that time couldn’t erase.

Second, nuclear weapons devastate the environment. For example, the United States tested a massive hydrogen bomb on the Bikini Atoll in 1954. It’s more than 65 years later, but this location in the Marshall Islands chain is still not livable.

In conclusion, nuclear weapons are a critical problem that may cause threats all over the world. Therefore, the key to dealing with it should be addressed immediately.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 Trần Ánh Vy 78 view
2024-10-21 aceg1000 73 view
2024-10-19 vidung 90 view
2024-10-19 Tuan Harry 11 view
2024-10-19 Tuan Harry 11 view
Essays by user Ngoc21 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have been arguing about whether or not to use nuclear weapons. While there is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of view, I totally disagree with it. First, using nuclear weapons isnt the be...
^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...th it. First, using nuclear weapons isnt the best way to solve the problem. Whil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... a fission bomb, nicknamed 'Fat Man,' on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogical scars that time couldn’t erase. Second, nuclear weapons devastate the en...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll Islands chain is still not livable. In conclusion, nuclear weapons are a cri...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04365079365 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53936940034 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65873015873 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8206126583 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4375 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154933259144 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524521636847 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674982994556 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104556108618 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461695276626 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.